The content of the production was clearly emphasized; its style was less satisfactory. Chekhov has his own particular style of writing, one where laughter and tears are perilously close together. The actors are required to pay attention to every word in a speech to understand how this technique works. For British actors, this is very difficult to achieve, especially if you have been trained to wear your emotions on your sleeve: on several occasions I have witnessed Chekhov revivals that concentrate on the melancholic elements without understanding just how funny some of the dialogue actually is.
Their plight is entirely self-created, and deserves as much scorn as sympathy. Three Sisters is not a tragedy, but a tragi-comedy thst asks us to think of ourselves and our lack of positive energy.
The effect is not unlike Brecht, where the actors try not to get inside a character but rather portray the externals. In Britain, on the other hand, the cast go for emotional identification, which I am not sure is the best strategy. Laurence Raw 1 October Download File. Will they be required to wear masks that stifle their by The Ensemblist 16 min listen.
Antony and Cleopatra: What kind of tragedy is this play, with its two central figures rather than a singular hero? The ninth lecture in the Approaching Shakespeare series tries to find out. Related Articles. Reviews What people think about Three Sisters 4. Rate as 1 out of 5, I didn't like it at all. Rate as 2 out of 5, I didn't like it that much. Rate as 3 out of 5, I thought it was OK. Rate as 4 out of 5, I liked it. Rate as 5 out of 5, I loved it.
Rating: 0 out of 5 stars. Write a review optional. Reader reviews wonderperson. At first this play could be entitled Noisy Idiots --it's all very blustery and endearing, and certainly just the kind of warmth and din you'd want on entering the theatre on a January day in Russia in but you do settle in for some sub- School for Scandal -type proceedings, hijinx in any case. The sisters are bored-- bien.
Olga is a spinster, Masha is married and bored, Irina is pretty as a sugared confection and doesn't love any of the local notables and gots to get to Moscow where rela life will begin. Bien, bien. Their brother Andrei is a big-thought-thinker whose status as the baby of the family has long since shaded into awwardness with the outside world, itself browning into misogyny.
And then the soldiers come to town. It's a setting rich with promise--everone's so desperate for something to happen that you know when it does they're gonna milk it.
X is gonna turn her nose up at Y, who will be overheard speaking to Z by A, who owes money to B, who is in love with C and her barbed tongue, bien, bien, bien! And everyone leaves a little warmer after "visiting with the Prozorovs," as the Russians were are? Everybody yells, everybody laughs, the inevitable romantic misunderstanding is defused before anyone gets more than a scare.
Except, just as real family life is never as jolly as it seems over the Thanksgiving table or what have you, things are gonna fall apart for our favourite family the ones whom we wish we could actually visit, all alone in our big house in the winter with nobody but Sergei and Katya and the children and old "Auntie" Lidia Ivanovna in her room on the top floor. If they seem like such a shockingly real family to me with my how-much-poorer twenty-first-century web of one father, one mother, one sister, and one beautiful!
And I am a deeply ignorant fellow, but I don't kow of an earlier example of dramatic family fallapart that feels so real. No fated Greekness, none of that deep French cynicism about the meaningful life, no arbitrary Shakespearean event leading to mutual assured destruction among all the characters too heroic to ever live anyway, of course. These Russians are, as they always are, the first and best existentialists, all looking for one reason to stop yelling and feel calm in their limitedness and their mortality, even amid the endless steppe one aspect of Irina's ever-awaited return to Moscow is no doubt to avoid looking out into that perfect dark.
That is, two of our three destroyers are Vershinin, the "philosopher" a luxury impossible, irresponsible, criminally culpable, in these circumstances, on the ragged frontline of the bourgeois world! But three sisters still outweighs two destroyers--it's when their brother marries Natasha that the critical mass becomes unbearable.
Amid so much richly realistic human fellowship and strife, she's the only one with whom it's impossible to sympathize--the provincial petty-bourgeois climber, ruthlessly fighting her way into the manor house, that outpost of metropolitan legitimacy.
She is reprehensible, and the sisters--distracted by the soldiers, her horsemen--don't have the stomach. And she usurps them, and the last homely house is destroyed. But it doesn't burn, even though the village does--Chekhov is too sophisticated, too matter of fact for that cheap symbolism. The play ends with the little pas a deux of Chebutykin: "It doesn't matter, it doesn't matter"--and Olga--"If we only knew, if we only knew! How can you bear what is when there's also a what could be?
A what could have been? We do know one thing: contrary to Vershinin's much-expressed hope, life is not gonna become "easier and brighter"; the whole play abuses him, who on the surface seems its romantic hero. Or at least, if utopia is really out there, it's far, far beyond the horizon--the play ends in the revolutionary year , and on his year timeline one wonders how many Russians will be here to see the world in which the yelling soul is soothed.
If we only knew, if we only knew! The two stars are more for the recording than the story content. I had trouble following the story because it's a play, meant to be seen not only heard, so it was difficult keeping track of the characters especially the men and grasping when the scene changed. Also, the quality of the recording is poor: some voices come through loudly, others are so quiet. It's as if there was a mic in the middle of the stage so voices directly under it are picked up, but not those on the periphery.
And I'm quite sure that on the 3rd CD the director or sound editor's voice is included, telling one of the sisters that her scream is too sharp, and she says "Okay" and repeats the last couple of lines. How sloppy! I should read or see the play instead. Robert Galgano. The play is great, maybe the greatest modern play of all.
These actors, though. This luminous version of Three Sisters , brilliantly performed by that ensemble, constitutes a complete explanation of why the Russians have taken Donnellan and Ormerod to their hearts…I have never seen a production of the play that moved with such expressive fluency or that communicated its volatile, contradictory moods with a more piercing precision. The production programme for Three Sisters Three Sisters colour production photography photos: Mikhail Guterman.
Back to top Three Sisters. Three Sisters. Written by Anton Chekhov Performed in Russia — Arguably the greatest play of the twentieth century, Three Sisters tells the tale of Olga, Irina and Masha whose lives are turned upside down by the arrival of glamourous officer Vershinin to their remote town.
0コメント